Sunday, April 26, 2026
Est. 2026 · Independent
Tracking every proposed hyperscale data center in Ohio's 88 counties.
Update — February 2026: Hilliard's lawsuit against Amazon's air permit is pending. The Ohio Power Siting Board has approved the project despite local opposition under Ohio's "behind-the-meter" power law (HB 15), which allows on-site energy generation for data centers while bypassing local zoning review. Construction targeted to begin January 2026; completion September 2027.
Data Center Risk
87/100
Very High

Why Franklin County is Very High risk

Score calculated from four factors: power infrastructure, water capacity, land availability, and current exposure (known projects in the county). Franklin County scores 87/100.

Power availability
30/30

Amazon's Hilliard campus is one of three planned in the Hilliard area alone. AEP Ohio territory; the Bloom Energy fuel-cell array would generate 73 MW on-site, classified as "behind-the-meter" generation under HB 15 — bypassing both AEP transmission constraints and local zoning.

Water capacity
9/15

Amazon's data center water plan has not been fully disclosed. The fuel-cell array itself does not consume water at material scale; the data center it powers does.

Land availability
8/15

Amazon already operates the Cosgray Road campus and is constructing a third Hilliard campus at Scioto Darby Road and I-270. Land assembly is well advanced.

Current exposure
40/40

Amazon Cosgray Road operational; second campus operational; third campus under construction; 73-MW fuel-cell array approved by OPSB and Ohio EPA over Hilliard's objection.

This score is comparative, based on publicly available data across Ohio's 88 counties. Methodology: how we calculate it.
At a Glance

The facts, as filed.

Project Component
228-fuel-cell Bloom Energy array
Power Output
73 megawatts
Footprint
~6 acres
North America Ranking
Largest fuel-cell installation in N.A.
World Ranking
2nd largest (after 80-MW South Korea facility)
Permitted CO2
1.45 million pounds per day
Equivalent
Daily emissions of ~66,000 cars
Operator
AEP Ohio (subsidiary)
Customer
Amazon Web Services
Fuel Cell Mfr.
Bloom Energy
Construction Start
January 2026
Completion
September 2027
Local Opposition
Rise Up Hilliard (Annie Cannelongo, Annette Singh, Ighnat)
City Position
Sued (admin court appeal of Ohio EPA air permit)
Approving Body
Ohio Power Siting Board (OPSB) + Ohio EPA
Bypass Mechanism
Ohio HB 15 "behind-the-meter" provision
Adjacent Land Use
Elementary school, neighborhood park, residential subdivision
The Full Story

Cosgray Road / Bloom Energy Fuel Cells, explained.

Amazon Cosgray Road Data Center + AEP Ohio/Bloom Energy 73-MW Fuel Cell System (Cosgray Road / Bloom Energy Fuel Cells)
Air Permit in Litigation; Construction Imminent

Hilliard is a Columbus suburb of about 38,000 people with two-story homes, sidewalks, and the kind of subdivision-with-neighborhood-park layout that Ohio Capital Journal photographer Nick Evans called "a classic suburb." Annie Cannelongo and Annette Singh are neighbors who have lived in the same Hilliard subdivision for years. They both have young kids. They both love the area.

What they don't love is the 73-megawatt fuel-cell array that Amazon and AEP Ohio plan to install at the Cosgray Road data-center campus next door. The array would consist of 228 Bloom Energy fuel cells spanning roughly six acres — powered by an eight-inch natural-gas main forced through cells in a non-combustion process. At 73 MW, the installation would be the largest of its kind in North America and the second-largest in the world.

The Ohio EPA's air permit allows the array to emit up to 1.45 million pounds of carbon dioxide per day — comparable, the City of Hilliard noted in its appeal, to the daily emissions of 66,000 cars. Amazon's permit application sits adjacent to a Hilliard elementary school and a neighborhood park where Annette Singh's kids ride bikes. Cannelongo, in formal comments to the Ohio Power Siting Board, asked: "There is no real research about the safety of this kind of power plant, and it's sitting adjacent to a neighborhood and elementary school in Hilliard. How does that impact a park that it abuts? It's a playground. My kids ride their bike there every other day."

The city of Hilliard initially tried to block the proposal through local rezoning. State authorities — specifically the Ohio Power Siting Board (OPSB), which claims total authority over power-siting decisions — overrode the city. Hilliard then filed an administrative-court appeal of the Ohio EPA's air permit, arguing the agency failed to give the city proper notice before issuing the permit. The case is pending. Hilliard City Council passed a resolution opposing the project; AEP Ohio's attorney told the city: "No further review is necessary," citing OPSB approval.

Bloom Energy submitted a report stating the project's emissions "do not represent a cause for concern." The company noted fuel cells produce fewer emissions than traditional power sources and stated: "The predicted CO2 concentrations from the project are a fraction of typical ambient air concentrations and are not predicted to have a measurable impact on local air quality." Cannelongo's response: "We don't trust that they're unbiased. We want an independent study."

The legal mechanism enabling the project is Ohio HB 15, the major utilities-overhaul bill passed in 2025 that allows data centers to install "behind-the-meter" on-site power generation while largely bypassing local zoning review. The bill was framed as a way to reduce data-center load on the public grid. Innovation Ohio has argued it should be tightened to require fully on-site power generation; HB 706 (now in committee) would extend AEP Ohio's 85% data-center tariff statewide as a complementary tool.

Timeline

How we got here.

Pre-2025
Amazon assembles and operates two Cosgray Road data-center campuses in Hilliard. Begins planning a third campus at Scioto Darby Road / I-270.
2025
Ohio HB 15 passed, allowing "behind-the-meter" data-center power generation while bypassing local zoning. AEP Ohio and Amazon plan a 73-MW Bloom Energy fuel-cell array adjacent to Cosgray campus.
October 15, 2025
Hilliard Planning and Zoning Commission tables Amazon's proposal. Council member Les Carrier says: "They're trying to bootstrap a power plant into a data center approval process."
October 28, 2025
Hilliard City Council formally opposes the project. AEP Ohio responds via attorney: "No further review is necessary," citing OPSB approval.
Late 2025
Hilliard appeals the Ohio EPA's air permit, which allows up to 1.45 million pounds CO2 per day. The city also requests an independent air-quality study.
November 2025
Hilliard Planning and Zoning Commission expected to revisit the proposal.
December 2025
Bloom Energy releases its own emissions report, stating "no cause for concern."
January 2026 (planned)
Construction targeted to begin on the fuel-cell array.
February 9, 2026
Signal Ohio publishes detailed lawsuit coverage. Annie Cannelongo's formal OPSB comments published.
March 12, 2026
Ohio Capital Journal publishes Cannelongo and Singh profile, framing Hilliard as the leading example of post-HB 15 conflict between data-center power siting and local zoning.
September 2027 (target)
Fuel-cell array completion.
What It Means

For Franklin County residents.

HB 15 and local zoning

The Hilliard fuel-cell case is the most important post-HB 15 stress test of local zoning authority versus state power-siting authority. If Hilliard loses its administrative-court appeal, the precedent will allow data-center developers across Ohio to install massive on-site generation regardless of local zoning — effectively neutralizing one of the few tools small Ohio cities have for limiting data-center impacts.

The CO2 number

The 1.45 million pounds of CO2 per day figure is from Hilliard's own legal filing, citing the Ohio EPA air permit. The 66,000-car-equivalent comparison is also Hilliard's. Bloom Energy's response — that fuel cells produce fewer emissions than traditional sources — is technically accurate per unit of electricity generated, but the absolute emissions volume sits adjacent to a residential subdivision and elementary school. The disagreement between these two framings is the case in microcosm.

The 45-day petition window

Singh has highlighted that under current OPSB procedure, residents have only 45 days to formally petition or object to a power-siting decision after notice. As Singh told Ohio Capital Journal: "There's no way for anyone to petition, to question it. The cities lose power, and to me, it's pulling power in the wrong direction." Whether the legislature shortens or lengthens this window is the next policy fight to watch.

What residents elsewhere should learn

The Hilliard pattern — large-scale on-site power siting via OPSB authority, bypassing local zoning under HB 15 — is now the template that any community with an Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Google, or other hyperscale presence should expect. Communities that want to influence outcomes need to engage at the OPSB level (state) and the legislative level (HB 706 and successor bills), not local zoning alone.

Sources

Reporting we relied on.

  • NBC4 (WCMH Columbus) — Hilliard City Council opposition and resident testimony
  • Ohio Capital Journal (Nick Evans) — Cannelongo and Singh profile, broader policy context
  • Signal Ohio — lawsuit detail, 1.45M lbs CO2 figure, Cannelongo OPSB comments
  • 10TV (WBNS Columbus) — Hilliard Planning Commission tabling and Carrier quote
  • City of Hilliard administrative court filing — air-permit appeal
  • Bloom Energy emissions report — primary developer response
  • Ohio Power Siting Board case docket
  • Ohio HB 15 statutory text